After the materials are taken from the warehouse, if only the person who receives them is recorded, it will be difficult for the project accounting to explain where the materials are used. Engineering material management should link the receipt, return and allocation to the construction site, which not only supports on-site operations, but also can find out the specific basis for quantity changes.

How to arrange records and operations

Record the items, parts, uses and units in the application, and confirm the actual quantity when leaving the warehouse. The corresponding relationship will be registered after the replacement material is confirmed by the business, and you cannot just change the material name. When the remaining materials are returned, the original requisition record is associated, and cross-project transfers preserve the relationship and approval between both parties to avoid adding or subtracting only to the total inventory.

The material requisition form can save the requested quantity and the actual outbound quantity at the same time. The reason for the difference will be confirmed by the handover position. When a collection record is allocated to multiple parts, the detailed quantity should be consistent with the total quantity. On-site returned materials can be classified into those that can be continued to be used, those that need to be inspected, and those that can be scrapped. They cannot all be received as normal inventory. Repeat submissions and offline supplementary registration use the same business ID. When querying consumption, the use, return and transfer are displayed separately, so that managers can know which actions the net usage comes from, and avoid mistaking cross-position transfers as new consumption.

Specific scenarios that need to be checked

For example, if the on-site purchase is by root and the purchase is settled by weight, the conversion basis and error handling should be clearly defined. Test batch collection, material return and position adjustment, and check that the summary is consistent with the details. For material discrepancies, check the original business first. It is not appropriate to directly use a cost adjustment to replace the quantity reason analysis.