System acceptance requires converting function names into operation scenarios. Gongqixin’s official website provides a consultation portal for the development content. The delivery scope and acceptance conditions of the actual project need to be clarified in conjunction with the business. It is difficult to judge whether specific functions are completed by listing the module name alone.

Acceptance Basis

Organize the inspection items according to the confirmed functions, interfaces and roles, so that each requirement has corresponding operations and expected results. Only checking that the page can be opened is not enough to confirm that business data and permissions are processed correctly.

Test data

Use prepared desensitization or sample data to cover normal processes, repeated submissions, missing data and unauthorized operations. Test records describe scenarios and results, making it easy to distinguish differences in business understanding and implementation issues.

Problem handling

Problems discovered during acceptance can be sorted out according to impact and scope, and relevant scenarios can be checked again after modification. New requirements should be stated separately and all follow-up ideas should not be mixed into the original problem list.

Scenario verification

The sample acceptance record can include the scenario name, preconditions, operation steps and results. After passing the data, the data can be retained and the same scenario can be checked again for subsequent function adjustments to help identify whether the changes affect the original business.

Specific verification methods

Indicate the account number, pre-requisite information and steps for each scenario; check the page feedback and business records; add insufficient permissions, repeated submissions and missing data; check whether the process can still be continued after recovery, and state the expected results in the questions to avoid describing the entire module with only two conclusions: it can be used or it cannot be used.

The acceptance record retains a repeatable execution path and can be checked again after function changes. Both parties confirm the results around the same scenario, which helps to clarify the location of modifications and facilitates querying the original rules and scope of use after delivery.